UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2349

NANCY LEE BOGART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DIMITRA J. CURRY; GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY; NA- TIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company & Affiliated Companies; CHRISTOPHER W. BOGART, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-907)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nancy Lee Bogart, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Lance Robey, ROBEY & TEUMER, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lees' motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying Appellant's motion to reconsider. See 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny Appellant's motion to compel Appellees to respond to interroga- tories. Bogart v. Curry, No. CA-97-907 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13 & Sept. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED