United States v. Reavis
United States v. Reavis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SANDRA REAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-92-68, CA-97-139)
Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 3, 1998
Before ERVIN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra Reavis, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant Sandra Reavis seeks to appeal the district court's
order denying her motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994
& Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Reavis, No. CR-92-68; No. CA-97-139 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished