United States v. Beckett
United States v. Beckett
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARCELLUS DERRELL BECKETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-682, CA-96-1797-2-8)
Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 3, 1998
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcellus Derrell Beckett, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning
of the district court.* United States v. Beckett, Nos. CR-94-682; CA-96-1797-2-8 (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* In addition to the facts discussed by the district court, the record overwhelmingly reveals that Appellant physically carried his drugs, drug distribution paraphernalia, and weapon. See United States v. Mitchell,
104 F.3d 649, 653-54(4th Cir. 1997).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished