Noakes v. Ford
Noakes v. Ford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2632
KIRSTEN M. NOAKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LESLIE P. FORD; DOES 1 Through 3,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-619-R)
Submitted: March 17, 1998 Decided: March 31, 1998
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kirsten M. Noakes, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her
action under the Federal Tort Claims Act under both Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. We modify the dis-
missal, however, to fall only under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and to be without prejudice to Appellant's opportunity to exhaust her
administrative remedies. See
28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) (1994); McNeil v. United States,
508 U.S. 106, 113(1993). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished