Allen v. Mahon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Allen v. Mahon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7588

DIVETO M. ALLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-831)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 31, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diveto M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Ann Bullock Walker, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1997).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis-

miss the appeal. Allen v. Mahon, No. CA-96-831 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4,

1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Both parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c) (1994).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished