U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Watkins v. Corcoran

Watkins v. Corcoran
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 9, 1998

Watkins v. Corcoran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6137

WENDELL L. WATKINS, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-2279-H)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendell L. Watkins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal two district court orders, the first denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and the second denying his motion for "newly discovered evidence" and for an evidentiary hearing. We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Watkins v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-2279-H (D. Md. Jan. 8 & 20, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.