Godwin v. Jumbo Sport
Godwin v. Jumbo Sport
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1071
GAIL W. GODWIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JUMBO SPORT, formerly known as Richmond Sports, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-669-3)
Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gail W. Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CHRISTIAN & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her claims of harassment and religious discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Godwin v. Jumbo Sport, No. CA-97-669-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.