Lloyd v. Lanham
Lloyd v. Lanham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7038
WINSTON LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; MELANIE PEREIRA, Deputy Commissioner of Corrections; EARL BESHEARS, Warden; GLENN T. MARROW, Assistant Attorney General, all defen- dants sued individually and in their official capacity; DOCTOR SEIFERT, sued individually and in her official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-127-PJM. CA-97-32-PJM)
Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his consolidated
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaints. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Lloyd v. Lanham, Nos. CA-97-127-PJM; CA-97-32-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished