Lloyd v. Lanham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lloyd v. Lanham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7038

WINSTON LLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner of Corrections; MELANIE PEREIRA, Deputy Commissioner of Corrections; EARL BESHEARS, Warden; GLENN T. MARROW, Assistant Attorney General, all defen- dants sued individually and in their official capacity; DOCTOR SEIFERT, sued individually and in her official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-127-PJM. CA-97-32-PJM)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 7, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his consolidated

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaints. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Lloyd v. Lanham, Nos. CA-97-127-PJM; CA-97-32-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished