U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Yancey v. Natl Ctr Institution

Yancey v. Natl Ctr Institution
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 24, 1998

Yancey v. Natl Ctr Institution

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1023

VERA YANCEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 3557-AMD)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 24, 1998

Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vera Yancey, Appellant Pro Se. David Scott Greber, Stephen Samuel Burgoon, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Vera Yancey appeals the district court's order dis- missing her employment discrimination claim filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2000h-6 (West Supp. 1994), the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West Supp. 1995), and the Fair Labor Stan- dards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (West 1978 & 1985 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yancey v. National Ctr. on Inst. & Alterna- tives, CA-96-3557-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.