Yancey v. Natl Ctr Institution
Yancey v. Natl Ctr Institution
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1023
VERA YANCEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 3557-AMD)
Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 24, 1998
Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vera Yancey, Appellant Pro Se. David Scott Greber, Stephen Samuel Burgoon, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant Vera Yancey appeals the district court's order dis-
missing her employment discrimination claim filed under Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2000h-6 (West
Supp. 1994), the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990,
42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213(West Supp. 1995), and the Fair Labor Stan- dards Act,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219(West 1978 & 1985 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Yancey v. National Ctr. on Inst. & Alterna- tives, CA-96-3557-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished