Cheek v. Bender
Cheek v. Bender
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7168
ROBERT L. CHEEK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
HAROLD J. BENDER, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-95-410-3-MU)
Submitted: March 10, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Cheek, Appellant Pro Se. E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, POYNER & SPRUILL, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration in his legal malprac- tice action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cheek v. Bender, No. CA-95-410-3- MU (W.D.N.C. July 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.