United States v. Haigler
United States v. Haigler
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6096
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDDIE HAIGLER, a/k/a Ram,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-186-5, CA-95-2208-5-6)
Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 1, 1998
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Haigler, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Glenn Chandler, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel-
lee's motion for summary judgment and denying his motion filed
under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Haigler, Nos. CR-89-186-5; CA-95-2208-5-6 (D.S.C. Nov.
24, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy,
521 U.S. ___,
1997 WL 338568(U.S.
June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished