UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1235

WILLIAM SANFORD GADD; EDDIE BRADFORD LEE,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ROBERT D. POTTER, United States District Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-640-3-MU)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 1, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Sanford Gadd, Eddie Bradford Lee, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their

complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gadd v. Potter, No. CA-97-640-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 1998). We further find that this

appeal is frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2