U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Lane v. Robinson

Lane v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 1998

Lane v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7093

MARCUS LANE, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

A. D. ROBINSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-96-1243-AM)

Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Lane, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Lane v. Robinson, No. CA-96-1243-AM (E.D. Va. July 21, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.