Dehoney v. Cepak

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dehoney v. Cepak

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7474

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden; WILLIAM JENNINGS, Deputy Warden; ALONZO CORNELIUS, Captain; TERRY L. WOOTEN, Assistant United States At- torney, individually and in official capacity, Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHARLES AUSTIN, Colonel, Columbia Police Chief,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3168-4-21BE)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina; Terry L. Wooten, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-

lief on his action raising claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) and

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), and order denying his motion to reconsider. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Cepak, No. CA-94-3168-4-21BE (D.S.C.

Aug. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished