Ward v. Ward
Ward v. Ward
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6582
WILLIAM RAY WARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1712-2-20AJ)
Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Ray Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assis- tant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Ray Ward seeks to appeal the district court's order
denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, as to the merits of Ward's claims, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Ward, No. CA-96-1712-2-20AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1997). Because Ward's petition
is meritless, we decline to address the retroactivity of the stat-
ute of limitations enacted in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214. We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished