U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Bishop Coal Company v. DOWCP

Bishop Coal Company v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 1998

Bishop Coal Company v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1654

BISHOP COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, versus

JOHN BALL; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COM- PENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-236-BLA)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: May 5, 1998

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Allan Smoot, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia; Kathy Lynn Snyder, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. John Ball, Respondent Pro Se; Christian P. Barber, Jill M. Otte, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent Director.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's deci- sion and order reversing the administrative law judge's decision and awarding black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Bishop Coal Co. v. DOWCP, No. 96-236-BLA (BRB Mar. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.