U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Wilder v. Harnage

Wilder v. Harnage
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 1998

Wilder v. Harnage

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2258

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BOBBY L. HARNAGE, National President, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO; JOHN GAGE, President, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO Local 1923; JOE FLYNN, Vice President, American Federation of Government Employees Local 1923, AFL-CIO; ANN ROBINSON, Vice President, American Federation of Government Employees Local 1923, AFL-CIO, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederick N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-97-2354-S)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Roth, Michael Jay Schrier, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel- lant's motion to dismiss, summarily denying Appellant's motion for summary judgment, and dismissing Appellant's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Sturdivant, No. CA-97-2354-S (D. Md. Sept. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.