U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

In Re: Propst v.

In Re: Propst v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 15, 1998

In Re: Propst v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-541

In Re: PHILLIP M. PROPST, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip M. Propst, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the Catawba County Superior Court to enter a discovery order. We lack jurisdiction to order the state court to act. See Davis v. Lansing, 851 F.2d 72, 74 (2d Cir. 1988). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.