U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Gaster v. Evatt

Gaster v. Evatt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 15, 1998

Gaster v. Evatt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7869

FRANK M. GASTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina De- partment of Corrections; MICHAEL J. CAVANAUGH, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1803-2-20AJ)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank M. Gaster, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert E. Peterson, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Lesli Brown Darwin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Janet L. Paduhovich, Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Gaster v. Evatt, No. CA-97-1803-2-20AJ (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.