U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Dahmas v. CVS Pharmacy MD

Dahmas v. CVS Pharmacy MD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 15, 1998

Dahmas v. CVS Pharmacy MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1066

AHMAD A.N. DAHMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CVS PHARMACY IN MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1025-AW)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad A.N. Dahmas, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Ann Khan, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ahmad A.N. Dahmas appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for CVS Pharmacy in Maryland on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dahmas v. CVS Phar- macy, No. CA-96-1025-AW (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1997). Dahmas' expressions of dissatisfaction with his counsel's performance merit no relief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.