United States v. Dailey
United States v. Dailey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7453
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES L. DAILEY, JR., a/k/a Chuck, a/k/a Beck Beck, a/k/a JDL, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 97-7454
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JAMES L. DAILEY, JR., a/k/a Chuck, a/k/a Beck Beck, a/k/a JDL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-63-R, CR-93-186-R) Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: May 14, 1998
Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Dailey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: James L. Dailey, Jr., appeals the district court's order deny- ing his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Dailey, Nos. CR-93-63-R; CR-93-186-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 1997). We deny Dailey's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.