Wright v. Martin
Wright v. Martin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6681
ROBERT WAYNE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LIEUTENANT MARTIN; SERGEANT MATHEWS; SERGEANT GLADMAN; SERGEANT SESSIONS; OFFICER REYNOLDS; OFFICER HAM, Each individually, and as em- ployees of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2897-0-8BD)
Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Wayne Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Martin, No. CA- 95-2897-0-8BD (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.