UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2405

ERNEST G. PORTERFIELD; ALICE PORTERFIELD THORN; WILLARD R. MEADOWS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

ROBERT F. HODGES, Lawyer for Mary Mood North- ern, Incorporated; BRIAN SCHEID, Lawyer for Mary Moody Northern, Incorporated; THE HONOR- ABLE J. COLIN CAMPBELL; THE HONORABLE HARRY L.

CARRICO, Chief Justice, State Supreme Court, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (MISC-97-49)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest G. Porterfield, Alice Porterfield Thorn, Willard R. Meadows, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing their action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1998), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Porterfield v. Hodges, No. MISC- 97-49 (W.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1997). See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED