U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Hassan v. AT&T Corporation

Hassan v. AT&T Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 13, 1998

Hassan v. AT&T Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2722

G. S. HASSAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

AT&T CORPORATION; PHILLIS S. PARSON; GEORGE BEACON; WILLIAM SNEIRSON; MADELINE C. PETTERS; SNYDER COMMUNICATION L.P.; VINCENT CANDIDA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-1433-A)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

G. S. Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Land Lewis, SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Washington, D.C.; Philip John Harvey, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his request to stay proceedings, denying his request for sanctions on opposing counsel, and dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging violations of his civil and constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hassan v. AT&T Corp., No. CA-97-1433-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.