Gearheart v. Wallace
Gearheart v. Wallace
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6747
VICKI DEPEW GEARHEART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MATTHEW L. WALLACE, Esquire; WENDY HOBBS, War- den; RON ANGELONE; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor of Virginia, Defendants - Appellees, and
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA SOLICITOR; VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CAROLINE W. MATTOS, Clerk of Greenville County Court, Greenville, SC, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-95-637-2)
Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vicki Depew Gearheart, Appellant Pro Se. W. Howard Boyd, Jr., Ronald Keith Wray, II, GIBBES, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Green- ville, South Carolina; M. Pierce Rucker, II, Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; Alexander Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gearheart v. Wallace, No. CA-95-637-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 1997). We deny Gearheart's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.