U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Singletary v. State of North Carl

Singletary v. State of North Carl
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 1998

Singletary v. State of North Carl

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6152

SHAWN D. SINGLETARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA HIGH- WAY PATROL DIVISION; BLADEN COUNTY; BLADEN COUNTY JAIL; D. T. HILBURN, Trooper, Individ- ually; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, II, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-129-7-F-2)

Submitted: May 5, 1998 Decided: May 19, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn D. Singletary, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, Reuben Franklin Young, NORTH CAROLINA DE- PARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; G. Christopher Olson, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying re- lief on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Singletary v. North Carolina, No. CA-97-129-7-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18 & Dec. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.