U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Bazilio

United States v. Bazilio
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 1998

United States v. Bazilio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TROY NOLAN BAZILIO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-93-41-F, CA-97-32-5-F)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Nolan Bazilio, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and granting in part his motion for reconsideration.* We have re- viewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bazilio, Nos. CR-93-41-F; CA-97-32-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 3 & Aug. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

* Although the district court modified the reasoning of its prior order, it upheld the dismissal of Appellant's § 2255 motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.