U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. McCullers

United States v. McCullers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1998

United States v. McCullers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6324

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DEMETRIUS LAMONT MCCULLERS, a/k/a Meek, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51-BO)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Lamont McCullers, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appel- lant's motion to compel the Government to make a Fed. R. Crim. P. motion or motion under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 (1996), for a downward departure based on substantial assistance.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McCullers, No. CR-96-51-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.