U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Gilmore

United States v. Gilmore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 1998

United States v. Gilmore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

BRAZE GILMORE, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-34, CA-97-125-R)

Submitted: April 21, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Braze Gilmore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gilmore, Nos. CR-95-34; CA-97-125-R (W.D.

Va. Nov. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.