UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1542

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF VIRGINIA MIDLAND, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SALLY E. GREENHOUSE; TROY A. TITUS, Defendants - Appellees, and

GCI, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-965-A)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raighne Coleman Delaney, MURRAY & JACOBS, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. James Robert Hart, John Lee Daugherty, DIXON, SMITH & STAHL, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee; Troy A. Titus, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing its civil action under the Miller Act and order denying its motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. United States ex rel.

Virginia Midland, Inc. v. Greenhouse, No. CA-95-965-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 20 & Mar. 15, 1996). We deny Appellant’s “motion for aid and direction” and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED