U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Smith v. Daughtry

Smith v. Daughtry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 1998

Smith v. Daughtry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7759

PETE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SYLVESTER DAUGHTRY, Greensboro, North Carolina Chief of Police; S. LANGHOLE, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-363-2)

Submitted: June 9, 1998 Decided: June 23, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr., Greens- boro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Pete Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel. Smith v. Daughtry, No. CA-96- 363-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.