U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Wright v. Robinson

Wright v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 2, 1998

Wright v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7035

WALTER LEE WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Secretary of Maryland De- partment of Public Safety and Correctional Services; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden sued in his individual and official capacities; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden sued in his indi- vidual and official capacities; JAMES MURPHY, Chief of Security sued in his individual and official capacities; MICHAEL MILLER, Classi- fication Counsel sued in his individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3748-AW, CA-96-3749-AW)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Robinson, Nos. CA-96-3748-AW; CA-96-3749-AW, (D.

Md. July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.