U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Mitchell v. Hawkins

Mitchell v. Hawkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 2, 1998

Mitchell v. Hawkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1393

WALLACE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ALPHONSO HAWKINS; DAVID B. MITCHELL; CORPORAL JERMYN; TIMOTHY J. LONG, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 840-L)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 2, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wallace Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Daniel Wallace, Michael Patrick Whalen, John Anthony Bielec, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Wallace Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and the order deny- ing his motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Hawkins, No. CA-95-840-L (D. Md. Jan.

22, 1997; Mar. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.