Murray v. US Postal Service
Murray v. US Postal Service
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1548
TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 445-L)
Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murray v. United States Postal Serv., No. CA-98-445-L (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1998). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.