U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Mills v. MD Penitentiary Hosp

Mills v. MD Penitentiary Hosp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 17, 1998

Mills v. MD Penitentiary Hosp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6343

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MARYLAND PENITENTIARY HOSPITAL DENTISTS; NATHAN FLETCHER, D.D.S., Maryland Penitentiary Dentist, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 97-6781

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MARYLAND PENITENTIARY HOSPITAL DENTISTS; NATHAN FLETCHER, D.D.S., Maryland Penitentiary Dentist, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 96-1277-DKC)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Leonard Mason, MASON, KETTERMAN & MORGAN, Baltimore, Maryland; Deborah Maude Peyton, MASON, KETTERMAN & MORGAN, Hunt Valley, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Maryland Penitentiary Hosp. Dentists, No. CA-96-1277-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 31 & May 8, 1997). We deny Appellant’s motion for a tran- script. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.