U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Conard

United States v. Conard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 1998

United States v. Conard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

BILL W. CONARD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-86-A, CA-97-147-1)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bill W. Conard, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion and his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Conard, Nos. CR-86-A; CA-97-147-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct.

3, 1997, Nov. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.