U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Harper-El v. Unknown Poultry

Harper-El v. Unknown Poultry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 21, 1998

Harper-El v. Unknown Poultry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7875

ALLEN HARPER-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNKNOWN POULTRY HOUSE OPERATORS, a/k/a Chicken Farmers; UNKNOWN REGIONAL/NATIONAL POULTRY PROCESSORS, a/k/a Poultry Producers; PRINCESS ANNE/E.C.I. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY; PARRIS GLENDENING, Governor; CURTIS DICKSON, Administrator; EARL D. BESHEARS, Chief Executive, Individually and in their business and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 3903-L)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allen Harper-El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harper-El v. Unknown Poultry House Operators, No. CA-97-3903-L (D. Md. Dec. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.