U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Carolina v. Cepak

Carolina v. Cepak
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 31, 1998

Carolina v. Cepak

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6998

RICHARD A. CAROLINA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

C. J. CEPAK, Warden of Broad River Correction- al Institution; JOHN MAXIE; CHRISTOPHER LONG; HARRIETTE FOWLER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3418-6-17)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Carolina, Appellant Pro Se. Holly Saleeby Atkins, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Richard A. Carolina appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Carolina v. Cepak, No. CA-96-3418-6-17 (D.S.C. June 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.