Saunders v. Attorney General NC
Saunders v. Attorney General NC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6500
EDWARD HAROLD SAUNDERS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-468-3-MU)
Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 29, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders v. Attorney Gen. of N.C., No. CA-96-468-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.