United States v. Middleton
United States v. Middleton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7180
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
BERNARD MIDDLETON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-348-A, CA-96-1097-AM)
Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order declining to grant relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) from the court’s order denying relief on Appellant’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) . We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Middleton, Nos. CR-92-348-A; CA- 96-1097-AM (E.D. Va. June 9, 1997). We deny Middleton’s motion for release pending review of the appeal as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.