U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Funderburk

United States v. Funderburk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1998

United States v. Funderburk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6370

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-52-C, CA-97-220-3-P)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICES OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Funderburk, Nos. CR-90-52-C; CA-97-220-3-P (W.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.