U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Hoover v. Scott Huesby & Assoc

Hoover v. Scott Huesby & Assoc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1998

Hoover v. Scott Huesby & Assoc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6353

NATHANIEL HOOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SCOTT HUSEBY & ASSOCIATES, individually and in his official capacity; BARBARA PETERSON, indi- vidually and in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-384-MU)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Hoover, a Texas inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hoover v. Scott Huesby & Assoc., No. CA-97-384-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.