UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1124

DOUGLASS W. KREHNBRINK; WILLIAM H. KREHNBRINK; DEBRA A. KREHNBRINK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; EDWARD W. WULKAN; BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MAJORIE M. ROFEL; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; NORMA CANTU; NAMED AND UNNAMED, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-1829-WMN)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 5, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglass W. Krehnbrink, William H. Krehnbrink, Debra A. Krehnbrink, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Jo Ann Grozuczak Goedert, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Leslie Robert Stellman, BLUM, YUMKAS, MAILMAN, GUTMAN & DENICK, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Douglass W. Krehnbrink, William H. Krehnbrink and Debra A.

Krehnbrink appeal the district court’s order dismissing this action brought predominantly pursuant to the civil remedies provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. See 20 U.S.C.A.

§ 1415(i)(2)(A)(ii) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Krehnbrink v. MD. St. Dep’t of Ed., No. CA-97-1829-WMN (D. Md. Jan.

16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED