United States v. Legrand
United States v. Legrand
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6564
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
KENNETH ORLANDO LEGRAND, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-100, CA-97-291-R)
Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998
Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Orlando Legrand, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Legrand, Nos. CR-93-100; CA-97-291-R (W.D.
Va. Feb. 10, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion to authorize a tran- script at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.