United States v. Runnells
United States v. Runnells
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6817
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
MARIKA LODY RUNNELLS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-53-N, CA-97-461-N)
Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marika Lody Runnells, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Karen L. Gore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. As a result of the statute of limitations embodied in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat 1214, Appellant was required to file her § 2255 motion on or before April 23, 1997.
See Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208). Appellant submitted her motion to prison officials for filing on April 24, 1997. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.