UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2426

SUE F. DAVIS, and on behalf on her children, Katherine D. Davis and Charlise S. Davis, and in class; DONNA MCCOMAS, individually and in class, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

RHONE-POULENC, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Rhone- Poulenc Ag Company, a New York Corporation; THE INSTITUTE PLANT OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-525-2)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sue F. Davis, Donna McComas, Appellants Pro Se. Alvin Lee Emch, Gretchen M. Callas, Mychal Schultz, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees and dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Rhone-Poulenc Inc., No. CA-96-525-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 11, 1997). We deny Appellants’ motion to have deposition transcripts made a part of the record on appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED