U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Ward

United States v. Ward
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1998

United States v. Ward

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6655

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

GEORGE ALLEN WARD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-70, CA-97-49-4)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Allen Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ward, Nos. CR-94-70; CA-97-49-4 (E.D. Va. May 30, 1997, Jan. 14, Feb. 10, & Mar. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.