U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Frazier

United States v. Frazier
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1998

United States v. Frazier

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6670

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PAUL E. FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-6671

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PAUL E. FRAZIER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-94-6, CA-97-65-3, CR-94-8, CA-97-66-3)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin David Mills, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant.

William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Frazier, Nos. CR-94-6; CR-94-8; CA-97-65-3; CA-97- 66-3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.