U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Trusty v. Sacchet

Trusty v. Sacchet
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 1998

Trusty v. Sacchet

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6161

TYRONE TRUSTY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 97-3477-S)

Submitted: July 28, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Trusty, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Trusty v. Sacchet, No. CA-97-3477-S (D. Md. Jan. 9, 1998). Appellant’s motion to compel a party to produce doc- uments is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.