Parham v. State of NC
Parham v. State of NC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1568
KARON ANN PARHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-216-H-5)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karon Ann Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Lars Franklin Nance, Michael F.
Easley, Robert Michael Curran, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Karon Parham seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing relief on her civil complaint alleging errors made during a Nash County, North Carolina, Superior Court proceeding. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Parham v. North Carolina, No. CA-98-216-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1998). We deny Parham’s motions to produce evidence and to command attendance at hearing. We deny Parham’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.